Experiences Of Protecting The Blind With Unexpected Events

Pharmacovigilance (PV)

Home Forums QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) Pharmacovigilance (PV) Experiences Of Protecting The Blind With Unexpected Events

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3819

    Hello.

    I am hoping someone might be willing to share their practical experiences of how they protect the blind (double blind trials) when dealing with potential SUSARs please, in particular with the following scenarios.

    1. When, after unblinding has occurred in preparation to submit a SUSAR, the participant is revealed to be taking placebo, how do you manage communications with site? I feel they should informed the event has not been submitted (for their own tracking / internal reporting purposes) but doing so would surely lead them to infer the pt is on placebo.

    2. Regs say ‘Events associated with placebo will usually not satisfy the criteria for a SUSAR. However, where SUSARs are associated with placebo (e.g. reaction due to an excipient or impurity), the sponsor should report such cases’. Has anyone reported a placebo event? At that stage of processing the event would the relatedness be made without inferring the patient is on placebo?

    Thank you.

    Rachel

    PhV Lead, Leeds CTRU.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
form

Get in touch

If you have any questions about the site, please feel free to contact us. We are always looking for ways to better serve our members - YOU are important to us!

(0113) 3439132

    Sign up to newsletter